Abstract: Neurolinguistic programmers claim that eye movement and other assessment (usually of verbal predicates in spoken language) of PRS (the favored system for processing sensory data) converge to define the same system. In this artifact-controlled study with 190 psychology and counseling students, PRS assessed by including or excluding first and last eye movements following questions were not systematically associated with counterpart sensory-specific questioning. There is little evidence other than from neurolinguistc workshops that supports the reliability of convergent assessments of PRS that identify individuals' preferred ways of experiencing the world. (PsycLIT Database Copyright 1990 American Psychological Assn, all rights reserved)